• Almost every research funding grant asks for a knowledge mobilization strategy.  In general, researchers want to do research that has value and impact.  KMb, in essence, consists of all the activities and outputs that builds awareness, and enables use of the research.
• A simple definition:  All the activities and products created that help your research be useful and used.   KMb = Knowledge to action. 
• KMb is an emerging field of work which leaves for room multiple definitions and perspectives and is multi-faceted with  varied roots and assorted branches.  ().
• This means you have the opportunity to think through and define what it means based on your hub’s needs and interests.

Purpose of knowledge Mobilization

• Why do research funders such as the Tri Council (SSHRC, CIHR, and NSERC) as well as many foundations expect researchers  to develop a knowledge mobilization strategy as part of a research grant proposal?
• The bottom line for funders is that they want the money they put towards research to have results.  A knowledge mobilization strategy demonstrates the linkages between the research results and addressing real world issues and shows how the research would be put into use.

SSHRC Perspective Expanded

Purpose of knowledge mobilization:

• Better connect social sciences and humanities research within and beyond academia, to maximize intellectual, cultural, social and economic impact. Framing our Direction, SSHRC 2010-2013
• The goal is to maximize the impact of research and to capture and communicate those impacts as widely as possible. As a result, researchers, institutions and funding agencies are deepening their engagement in knowledge mobilization and finding new ways to capture and communicate the many benefits research and research talent can offer to all sectors of the economy, culture and society.   Strengthening Canada’s Cultures of Innovation.  SSHRC Strategic Plan 2013-2016

SSHRC categorizes KMb into four domains:  Co-creation, Broker, Exchange and Dissemination.  Below are examples of activities under each of the domains.

Key Considerations in Knowledge Mobilization

• Knowledge mobilization and participatory action research share space. e.  Engagement activities inherent in participatory action research are simultaneously aspects of knowledge mobilization.  For example, a meeting bringing together stakeholders to identify the needs is a part of designing a research project, and simultaneously part of a KMb Strategy.  Please see attached diagram that shows the connections between KMb and the phases of research.
• KMb is a means rather than an end. The goal is not to only distribute the knowledge, but to share it in such a way that it is easily accessible, useful and used. Understanding the world of the potential user enables creation of KMb products and activities that makes adoption and application more likely.  Start with a focus on the potential user and their use of the information.  Do a thorough analysis of their context, interests, needs, and their trusted sources.
• Knowledge does not get used up when shared. A dizzying array of techniques exist. One piece of research can be shared in through multiple means.  Multiple means and ways of sharing enables meeting the of multiple audiences.  g. Knowledge may be shared via a journal article, a policy brief, an infographic, a play, a sculpture, a news release, a presentation, and be distributed via tweets, facebook posts, blogs, webinars, online conversations, face to face meetings and so forth.   Effective knowledge mobilization means understanding the audience(s) their information gather habits, the use to which they would put the knowledge, and your goal in sharing the knowledge.
• An academic paper published in an academic journal is knowledge mobilization but  only one aspect of knowledge mobilization.  You can expand the reach of your findings by using multiple media, formats, and distribution methods.   

Some Key Questions to ask yourself in developing a KMb Strategy

• What is the knowledge the research will generate?
• Who are the audiences and stakeholders? e. Who’s the knowledge for and with? Who cares about this issue?  Who should care?
• Who will use the knowledge? How will they use it?  How and to what extent do they want to participate in the design and delivery of the research?  What difference can the research make? To whom?  Who has the power to implement change?
• What is the most effective way to connect with each audience?
• What KMb activities make sense for each phase of my research?
• What do I want to accomplish through the research?
• To what extent will I include participatory action research thereby integrating knowledge mobilization from the beginning of my research project?

Assessing your KMb: Reach + Relevance + Relationship  = Results

KMb consists of four main aspects-  Reach, relevance, and relationship make up the key elements of achieving results.   Although effective reach, relevance, and relationship do not guarantee uptake and use of the research findings together they increase the likelihood of it being useful, useable, and used .

Reach speaks to the breadth of connections as reflected in the question ‘’Are we connecting with the people who care or should care about this issue?  Are we connecting with those who can make changes?

Relevance speaks to the question, ‘’To what extent do our KMb activities and products reflect the needs and interests of our audiences and stakeholders?’’   It also reflects the importance of the research to them.

Relationship speaks to the question, ‘’Are we connecting with the depth and breadth of audiences and stakeholders to the level of appropriate level of engagement?’’  Relationships, key to knowledge mobilization, come in many forms and levels.   While fully engaged partners are critical to the success of the research mobilization it is vital to pay attention to the needs and interests of the more peripheral participants.  Sharing with your core engaged partners while vital will not be enough to move your knowledge into action.

Graphic credit: Anthony Maki.  Adapted from 

• Fully engaged- partners:a relatively small group of people whose passion and engagement in the issue to be researched energize and nurture the community
• Active and supportive: Involved to some degree in the design and development but not as involved as the fully engaged group
• Interested occasionally active participants: Participate when the topic is of special interest, when they have some specific to contribute, or when they are involved in a project. This may also include policy makers and other decision makers who have an interest in the outcomes of the research, but do not actively participate in the research.
• Observer participants:people who have a sustained connection and interest in the research, but with less engagement and authority, either because they are still newcomers, because they do not have as much personal commitment, or need to keep in touch but cannot participate fully. These people may be active elsewhere and carry the learning to these places.

• Transactional participants: outsiders who interact with the research project occasionally without being members themselves, to receive or provide a service or to gain access to artifacts produced by the community, such as its publications, its website, or its tools.

Adapted from :  Wenger Traynor http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/11-12-Levels-of-participation-600.jpg

Results from your mobilization efforts can be difficult to ascertain and measure.  On one hand the outcomes from your mobilization efforts need to mirror the intended outcomes of your research which tend to require significant time to pass.   On the other hand, you can measure interim outcomes that can lead to the achievement of longer term goals.  For example, increased attention to the issue by decision makers that your research contributed to can be considered an interim result.  Longer term outcomes would be the implementation of the policy or practice change.

Want to read more about KMb?  

Have questions? Comments? Want to chat about your KMb options?

To find out about using Second Life to expand the audience for your conference, using infographics to raise awareness, gamification to reach additional audiences, storytelling to share your learning please drop in.  You’ll be glad you did.

Health, Science, Technology and Policy 5300: Knowledge Mobilization students will share the results of their investigations of specific techniques, in the Discovery Centre, MacOdrum Library,  March 10.  For more detail:  .

If you’re on the �Ӱ�ԭ�� University campus that afternoon please feel free to join us.

I had the opportunity to participate in a knowledge brokering workshop – “Knowledge Brokering: Creating links between people and knowledge” – led by Peter Levesque, the founder and president of the Institute for Knowledge Mobilization. Coming into the workshop, I had some initial reservations about what to expect. I knew I would be learning about a subject matter that was relevant to my position at CFICE but the grand question still remained – how did the terms “knowledge brokering” or “knowledge broker” relate to me as a research and multimedia assistant? I had never encountered these terms during my three years in the Multimedia Design program. What impact would this workshop have on me?

During the course the workshop, I suddenly realized that I have been a “knowledge broker” in several cases throughout my work and educational experience and even more so here at CFICE. Being a knowledge broker is synonymous to an intermediary or mediator – one who develops relationships and facilitates the exchange of knowledge amongst organizations or groups.

With an understanding of the term, it is easy to dissect and analyze its components.

Knowledge. One can interpret “knowledge” in a general sense. But knowledge in itself can be categorical and varies depending the context and situation. My knowledge lies in the area of multimedia design and development (i.e. graphic design, web development, etc.) In now knowing what my expertise is, how can I transfer my technical/design skills and add more value as a broker?

Broker. At CFICE, I’ve taken on tasks that focused on centralizing information (or “knowledge”) and ensuring accessibility amongst all hub members whether it’s via the organizational sites, the shared drive, or online tools.

For the Community First organizational site, I was responsible for restructuring and reorganizing the site layout and content so as to facilitate accessibility and readability of information for all members. This further led to the development a “News” page section pertaining to each hub as well as a centralized news page for CFICE.

Furthermore, in an effort to organize CFICE’s files and documents, I proposed a file management system that reflected the structure of the organization. With the file hierarchy, it allowed for the grouping of information in a meaningful and comprehensive way. This management proposal would guide and standardize the manner in which files and documents would be handled in an online domain.

A future database management project would also allow for all hub parties to share and revise information regarding report submissions and the status of publications. With such collective knowledge, the only way it can grow or increase in value is if all parties are aware, informed, and collaborative.

In the multimedia context, I help in aiding the sharing and exchange of information amongst groups. In that respect, I consider myself to be a knowledge broker. I contribute to the development of the organization’s social and media network and provide that chain to all CFICE members.

[polldaddy poll=7294264]